Chen et al., 2021], and come up with new problems that drive innovation in art and science [Gromov,

Chen et al., 2021], and come up with new problems that drive innovation in art and science [Gromov,

Such agents need to create and represent goals, select which ones to pursue and learn to achieve them.

Developmental AI is a bootstrapping approach where embodied AIs start with innate competences and learn by interacting with the world. They develop abilities in small steps along a bio-inspired trajectory. However, developmental AIs have not yet reached the abilities of young children. In contrast, mainstream approaches for creating AIs have led to valuable AI systems and impressive feats. These approaches include deep learning and generative approaches (e.g., large language models) and manually constructed symbolic approaches. Manually constructed AIs are brittle even in circumscribed domains. Generative AIs are helpful on average, but they can make strange mistakes and not notice them. They sometimes lack common sense and social alignment. This position paper lays out prospects, gaps, and challenges for augmenting AI mainstream approaches with developmental AI. The ambition is to create data-rich experientially based foundation models and human-compatible, resilient, and trustworthy AIs. This research aims to produce AIs that learn to communicate, establish common ground, read critically, consider the provenance of information, test hypotheses, and collaborate. A virtuous multidisciplinary research cycle has led to developmental AIs with capabilities for multimodal perception, object recognition, and manipulation. Computational models for hierarchical planning, abstraction discovery, curiosity, and language acquisition exist but need to be adapted to an embodied learning approach. They need to bridge competence gaps involving nonverbal communication, speech, reading, and writing. Aspirationally, developmental AIs would learn, share what they learn, and collaborate to achieve high standards. The approach would make the creation of AIs more democratic, enabling more people to train, test, build on, and replicate AIs.

Large class sizes pose challenges to personalized learning in schools, which educational technologies, especially intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), aim to address. In this context, the ZPDES algorithm, based on the Learning Progress Hypothesis (LPH) and multi-armed bandit machine learning techniques, sequences exercises that maximize learning progress (LP). This algorithm was previously shown in field studies to boost learning performances for a wider diversity of students compared to a hand-designed curriculum. However, its motivational impact was not assessed. Also, ZPDES did not allow students to express choices. This limitation in agency is at odds with the LPH theory concerned with modeling curiosity-driven learning. We here study how the introduction of such choice possibilities impact both learning efficiency and motivation. The given choice concerns dimensions that are orthogonal to exercise difficulty, acting as a playful feature. In an extensive field study (265 7-8 years old children, RCT design), we compare systems based either on ZPDES or a hand-designed curriculum, both with and without self-choice. We first show that ZPDES improves learning performance and produces a positive and motivating learning experience. We then show that the addition of choice triggers intrinsic motivation and reinforces the learning effectiveness of the LP-based personalization. In doing so, it strengthens the links between intrinsic motivation and performance progress during the serious game. Conversely, deleterious effects of the playful feature are observed for hand-designed linear paths. Thus, the intrinsic motivation elicited by a playful feature is beneficial only if the curriculum personalization is effective for the learner. Such a result deserves great attention due to increased use of playful features in non adaptive educational technologies.

In this extended abstract we discuss the opportunities and challenges of studying intrinsically-motivated agents for exploration in textual environments. We argue that there is important synergy between text environments and autonomous agents. We identify key properties of text worlds that make them suitable for exploration by autonmous agents, namely, depth, breadth, progress niches and the ease of use of language goals; we identify drivers of exploration for such agents that are implementable in text worlds. We discuss the opportunities of using autonomous agents to make progress on text environment benchmarks. Finally we list some specific challenges that need to be overcome in this area.

In the quest for autonomous agents learning open-ended repertoires of skills, most works take a Piagetian perspective: learning trajectories are the results of interactions between developmental agents and their physical environment. The Vygotskian perspective, on the other hand, emphasizes the centrality of the socio-cultural environment: higher cognitive functions emerge from transmissions of socio-cultural processes internalized by the agent. This paper argues that both perspectives could be coupled within the learning of autotelic agents to foster their skill acquisition. To this end, we make two contributions: 1) a novel social interaction protocol called Help Me Explore (HME), where autotelic agents can benefit from both individual and socially guided exploration. In social episodes, a social partner suggests goals at the frontier of the learning agent knowledge. In autotelic episodes, agents can either learn to master their own discovered goals or autonomously rehearse failed social goals; 2) GANGSTR, a graph-based autotelic agent for manipulation domains capable of decomposing goals into sequences of intermediate sub-goals. We show that when learning within HME, GANGSTR overcomes its individual learning limits by mastering the most complex configurations (e.g. stacks of 5 blocks) with only few social interventions.

This paper outlines a perspective on the future of AI, discussing directions for machines models of human-like intelligence. We explain how developmental and evolutionary theories of human cognition should further inform artificial intelligence. We emphasize the role of ecological niches in sculpting intelligent behavior, and in particular that human intelligence was fundamentally shaped to adapt to a constantly changing socio-cultural environment. We argue that a major limit of current work in AI is that it is missing this perspective, both theoretically and experimentally. Finally, we discuss the promising approach of developmental artificial intelligence, modeling infant development through multi-scale interaction between intrinsically motivated learning, embodiment and a fastly changing socio-cultural environment. This paper takes the form of an interview of Pierre-Yves Oudeyer by Mandred Eppe, organized within the context of a KI - K{\"{u}}nstliche Intelligenz special issue in developmental robotics.

A major challenge in the Deep RL (DRL) community is to train agents able to generalize over unseen situations, which is often approached by training them on a diversity of tasks (or environments). A powerful method to foster diversity is to procedurally generate tasks by sampling their parameters from a multi-dimensional distribution, enabling in particular to propose a different task for each training episode. In practice, to get the high diversity of training tasks necessary for generalization, one has to use complex procedural generation systems. With such generators, it is hard to get prior knowledge on the subset of tasks that are actually learnable at all (many generated tasks may be unlearnable), what is their relative difficulty and what is the most efficient task distribution ordering for training. A typical solution in such cases is to rely on some form of Automated Curriculum Learning (ACL) to adapt the sampling distribution. One limit of current approaches is their need to explore the task space to detect progress niches over time, which leads to a loss of time. Additionally, we hypothesize that the induced noise in the training data may impair the performances of brittle DRL learners. We address this problem by proposing a two stage ACL approach where 1) a teacher algorithm first learns to train a DRL agent with a high-exploration curriculum, and then 2) distills learned priors from the first run to generate an "expert curriculum" to re-train the same agent from scratch. Besides demonstrating 50% improvements on average over the current state of the art, the objective of this work is to give a first example of a new research direction oriented towards refining ACL techniques over multiple learners, which we call Classroom Teaching.